Tuesday, November 27, 2012

DTC 355 10 steps for a portfolio website


http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/02/26/10-steps-to-the-perfect-portfolio-website/

I really liked the suggestions on this website and the examples had some really great designs. After looking at them, I won't use all the 10 of the steps. I won't have a logo because I haven't really branded myself yet but I will have my name stand out on the first page. The tag line seems useful for conveying the real purpose of the website instantly.  I will obviously try to put up high quality images for the portfolio, but I'm not sure what kind of image viewer yet. I will definitely include an about me and link to a blog (although it's just academic stuff at the moment,) and a link to a contact page will be on the home screen but I don't think I'll link to my facebook. I don't think you have to be facebook friends with clients. The call to action on the first page will likely link to the portfolio, but the about me and contact links will stand out as well.

I like Ryan O'Rourke and Chikezie Ejias (Nine Lions) websites. First I liked the thumbnail on the 10 steps page but naturally, both sites are different now. I was initially drawn to the large room at the top that was designated for their name/logo. I like graphic design and that would be a cool way to show some skills on the very first page. Also, the image sets the color scheme for the rest of the page and it has a clean readable feel on both. On the new Nine Lion page, I like that the first page is just attention grabbing text/image that makes the viewer want to learn more. They are already interested before they learn anything. That also might be a dynamic way to set up a home page.

http://rourkery.com/

http://www.nineliondesign.com/

Friday, November 16, 2012

DTC 356 egypt and facebook


I thought Tom Slee's article "More Egypt, More Facebook" did  a good job relating the Arab spring event to previous revolutions. He talks about generational space, something that usually features a new technology that activists employ in order to raise awareness or coordinate events. He points out "... Facebook is still a generational phenomenon (60% of Egypt’s Facebook users are under 25 (»)). It is an environment where youth feel more at home than the older generation and the authorities, at least for now." It makes sense, the younger generating has latched on to something that they consider second nature, using this technology to further their cause.

On TV and in different articles, all I heard was that Facebook started a revolution. I'm glad that this article illustrates that is the people who started the revolutions, and they simply used Facebook as their modern tool. "Yes, the activists used Facebook and other tools, because that’s where the people are and because that is the medium characteristic of the time and place. But the Internet has not leant a new character to the uprising." Like pop music in the 1960s, Facebook was able to reach a widespread international audience. Facebook was something that everyone was paying attention to. Everyone heard the messages and common feelings of dissent were building.

This relates to the movie "Pump Up the Volume" with Christian Slater as a pirate DJ who ignites rebellion at a school (we watched it in my Digital Diversity class this summer). The kids rebelled because through their medium, in this case radio, they were all able to share collective feelings. They were able to come to the same conclusion at the same time which resulted in direct action.  
               
 Slee goes on to talk about how Faecbook is a big corporation and that they are making lives unnecessarily difficult for the young leaders. Facebook tends to delete accounts abruptly based on their rules for posting. He says "Most problematic is the policy that bans pseudonyms. Facebook defends the policy by saying their service is about “real people making real-world connections.” But what if the real world is full of secret police looking to crack down on dissent, or snooping bosses who might be supportive of a regime?" This is a good point but I don't think Facebook has an obligation to these people. Maybe they don't really want to get actively involved. Facebook was the right place to start and get the attention of their peers but before it was deactivated, but maybe they should have posted a link to a new blog or something. Facebook isn't the only option and shouldn't be have to be relied on entirely.

That being said, it would have been reasonable for Facebook to give them a warning, or at least give them a day or two before deleting accounts, given the gravity of the situation.

We would love if Facebook stepped up. If they recognized that they could play an important role as the new generational space. However, they must choose to take on that responsibility. However, they are a business, and they can choose to run it how they please. We all choose to sign up. 

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

DTC 356 new job openings


To start off I liked really liked some of the copyright related comments from John Perry Barlow. "We will need to develop an entirely new set of methods as befits this entirely new set of circumstances" While this seems to point at material the last half of the class, the important part of this statement is that we have an entirely new set of circumstances.  "They are proceeding as though the old laws can somehow be made to work, either by grotesque expansion or by force. They are wrong" (2). This applies to all policies that govern our current relationship with the internet not merely copyright.

The InfoDev article illustrated that an entirely new economic system is being developed due to new online work opportunities. They aren't talking about internet start-ups, but unskilled labor that completes simple tasks. It's funny they use 'unskilled'. Not too long ago my grandma put typing on her resume as a skill. While I didn't understand a lot of the economic jargon, I was really intrigued by the possibility of the third world getting involved with these jobs. With a little infrastructure, they could work online mining for gold, then receive online payment. The hardest part might be establishing a way to use that money when an ATM doesn't seem like the right fit. I don't know how it would work but some really smart people are probably gonna figure it out soon.

I read an article recently where One Laptop Per Child gave a bunch of kids in Ethiopia a box with tablets and no instructions. The kids were able to open the box, turn on the tablets, and begin using apps. While how much they will learn on their own is an interesting study, a little instruction could go a long way too. Now what if some of those apps taught the children how to mine gold, fill out forms, etc? When an internet connection is available, they will already have the skills to work on the spot.

If one laptop per child is successful, there will be an entire generation of people in third world countries that will be digitally literate. A entire work force with the skills and tools ready to make an impact on the economy. I don't think these developments will be easy to regulate, especially on a global scale. The normal economic policies will all have to change to respond to these new jobs on the rise. 

Thursday, October 18, 2012

DTC 355 project 3 proposal

My literacy narrative is going to be about how I communicate visually.

I want to begin with photos of my work from when I was little.
A quote from my mom will be playing but you don't actually have to watch her say it.
From there I will talk about how visuals changed from a hobby to a possible profession.
Next I'll talk about architecture and the two years I spent there.
Finally I will get to DTC and what kinds of visually oriented projects I have in the future.

I would like to convey humor but I think that will come as I'm writing/researching. Maybe from a few cut slides and exaggerated faces like the guy we watched last class.

Also, I want to music to play a large role because music also influences my art.
Hopefully I can convey a little humor or at least entertain with dramatic music and changes in tempo.
I want to use a combination of slides and video but I haven't quite decided what should be filmed.
Any ideas are welcome!

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

DTC 355 peer reviews

Sorry this is late. I totally spaced about the post until I went to finish the project just now and looked for the advice sheets.

The reviewers thought that I had a handle on the text. I had finished the intro and the first set of analysis and they were happy with the connections I made. I will try to re-emphasize the political nature of the works rather than just trying to explain the positive/negative effects of pot. I used a lot of the terminology from class but Josie mentioned that you can always use more!

A very useful piece of advice was to include a transitional statement or paragraph at the end of the intro calling the viewer to continue clicking the links on the side. This will help navigation for people who don't really know the project that well. Additionally, they mentioned that I could also look at what didn't work very well rhetorically which is something I hadn't thought about yet.

As far as aesthetics and functionality go, we agreed that a black outline on the titles was best and that the subtitle should also be black to separate it from the main text. Also, I need to add home links and links to the actual websites I'm analyzing.

DTC 356 Online Privacy


In the article "How Companies are Using Your Social Media Data" Leah Betancourt  begins by telling the audience that users have no idea that potentially every comment they have made online are being added to a large database. Most people's first reaction may be alarm but honestly, I think people should have figured that out by now. Almost every commerce side offers suggestions based on your purchases, favorites, and sometimes even what you viewed earlier that day! Everything we 'touch' in a digital  environment can be recorded and stored. We volunteer this information the second we click a link.

Problems occur when people forget this all important rule. In the study "Aliases, creeping and wall cleaning," Kate Raynes-Goldie includes the quote "Facebook makes things that should just have happened in passing totally permanent and public." This is the all important point that people need to understand. There really isn't online privacy. The article goes on to describe different methods people use to circumvent the view privacy setting that are put in place. A Facebook conversation can't be treated the same was as one with friends in person. You can't take back words once they make them online and phrases without context are especially dangerous.

Betancourt goes on to say that it doesn't seem all that scary. Why wouldn't these companies look at public information and try to profit from it. Seems natural enough to me. I don't mind if these companies use my facebook to give me ads designed for me specifically. I'm going to have to see ads regardless so they might as well be about things that interest me. The problem I have is when she starts to mention how facebook may affect your credit. She assures us our credit score is safe but specific offers can be determined by your friends on Facebook. This is where I would draw the line. Advertising is one thing but my friends should have nothing to do with any financial decisions in my life.

She says " Do you know if your Facebook friends have good credit histories? Likely not, but if you associate with people who are a good credit risk, than you’ll probably be a good credit risk, according to Sandberg. “The whole idea [is] like follows like.” Should I start unfriending people with bad credit scores so I'll look better? This may mark a shift between posting about yourself and posting what you want companies to think about you. This would defeat the purpose of most blogs and social networks that focus on expressing one's self. She reiterates is as tip #2 at the bottom of the page. Eliminate those you don't need. I guess one option would be to simply eliminate them from your social media connections. Maybe questionable friends should only be reached by phone or actually in person. Still this kinda bugs me. Your friends shouldn't be able to influence your job and certainly not financial offers. 

This is especially a concern because recently I read an article, (sorry I couldn't find a link,) that said that companies are wary of hiring people without Facebook because it may mean they are difficult to work with or they lack social skills. Raynes-Goldie also mentions "Moreover, the choice to use (or not use) sites like Facebook is often framed as one that is made freely and without consequence, when in reality there can be a high social cost to non–participation." So we have to use Social Media but companies will soon prevent us from socializing the way we want. I'm all for specific advertisments and song suggestions but eventually someone is going to take it too far....

Thursday, October 4, 2012

DTC 355 sources for project 2


Author: SaveCalifornia.com
Title: Marijuana Harms Families
Summary: A multimodal website featuring text and video. This site show the perspective of the debate from the anti-marijuana side. This site targets families and focuses on how marijuana will damage our children. The visual choices they made will be analyzed to compare to the pro-marijuana websites.
Rights: existing asset. Fair use should cover it because I'm using it for educational analysis and it is based off factual evidence.

Author:
Title: Citizens Against Legalizing Marijuana
Summary: This site takes a more friendly approach to target its voters with warm colors. However, it does immediately bring children into the front of the debate like the other anti-pot website. They both use the same strategy to target the audience but go about it in different ways. I will try to determine which is more successful during analysis.
Rights: Original asset. Sponsored by the Fair Political Practices Commission.


Author: Firedoglake
Title: Just Say Now.com
Summary: Provides a lot of images from the very beginning. It seems obvious that they are trying to get your attention. They then approach the call to action links which encourage people to call voters, buy t-shirts, etc. It seems al lot like the campaign sites looked at in class and this connection will be expanded on during analysis.
Rights: the site itself seems to be an Original asset but the articles it features are all from separate publications. I think fair use covers these because only small portions will be sampled and for educational purposes.

http://normal.org
Author: Norml Foundation
Title: Norml- Working to refor marijuana laws
Summary: This site focuses on reports concerning the marijuana debate. The site offers statistics on the states that are considering these reforms. Again it is laid out like the potential governors' websites. While the other was all about action, this site separates by talking about specific laws and using more political jargon.
Rights: Existing asset. Fair use should cover the use based on the nature of my project and the website is based on factual information. I won't be taking their opinions, just their facts.

Author: Campaign to Regulate Marijuana like Alcohol
Title: YES on 64- Campaign to Regulate Marijuana like Alcohol.
Summary: Focuses directly on one amendment that is trying to be passed in Colorado. The site gives details about what the amendment will do and possible outcomes if it's passed. This site doesn't try to distract or attract its viewers. It provides clear information with color that isn't normally related to the weed debate. It offers simple links to events but the professional nature of the site makes their arguments much more believable than some other sites.
Rights: Existing asset. Fair use will cover my use because of the educational nature of my project and the factual nature of this website.

Part 3
I will use an MLA format for the sources because it is a widely recognized style that includes all important information.


Wednesday, October 3, 2012

DTC 356 Lessarry


When it came to making his Supreme Court argument, Lessig could have really used some help from Parry. Like the moot lawyer Don Ayer said "you have to make them see the harm..." (237). In his writing Lessig admits that ignoring this advice may be biggest reason he lost the case. The justice's simply weren't interested in his argument about the history of our copyright policy. If it was so bad why should we have to change it now? If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Lessig wasn't able to convince them the system was broken. They needed specific reasons and Parry would have been the perfect man to give them. His presentation on knowledge cartels illustrated the damages that are being caused by extended copyright terms. He shows how little information is actually reaching the public domain due to the 'rights' that these big corporations have on material they didn't even create.

Parry should not have been the one to make this argument in court. Lessig's level head and professional diction would have gotten him farther than turning to the audience and yelling "Everyone Pirate Information!" Claims made in this manner and terms like 'pirate' will turn people away and make them disregard his argument. Lessig even mentioned that it was clear the Chief Justice thought they were "a bunch of anarchists" (239). If Parry was among them, this would have been confirmed.

Lessig was close. He had valid points but they were lost in the fray. Without illustrating the dangers, without making them care, the Justice's did very little to see the deeper connections within Lessig's argument. Parry is able to capture the audience's attention immediately but fails to recognize that people respond well when you tell them to break the law. The two of them together would have been the perfect amount of street and book smarts. They could have crafted an alarming argument, that grabs the attention of the court, illustrating how these extensions are going to ruin this country. Then they could have revealed the history that reinforces the unconstitutional nature of the law.

Hopefully someone will get another crack at copyright laws in a case like this one. Hopefully they will be able to show the harm copyright laws are inflicting on our society and offer a reasonable solution that will aid progress in the future. 

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

DTC 355 past and potential projects


I really like the simple layout of the Dove project. The alignment/sequence of pictures and text really make it clear what the site is about. The instructional text is clearly separated from others ensuring that the viewer knows how to use the site. I like that pictures of the different webtexts are used as the links. Much more interesting and cleaner than naming all of them separately.

My only criticism is that the text on the front page is a little too low. I think the large dove logo in the middle is unnecessary especially because it's already in a link just above it.
           
I think this site is very clever given the topic. They made a web comic analyzing web comics...mind blown. The way the character is telling us about the project is almost like a presentation. Also, not having too much text on the first page is good because the comic immediately attracts the viewer and makes them want to click to the next page.

One problem may be the amount and size of the text in the captions. I understand that it's a project so there has to be a lot of text but maybe space it out a bit more. Or maybe allow the user to click on the bubble and the text appears larger on the screen.
            
The last link didn't work for me :/ I'll add it to this post later if it gets fixed!
           
I want my first page to be relatively simple without any major text. A background picture of a person performing Hamlet holding a marijuana leaf instead of a skull is going to be the primary visual. The only text will be a title to give the viewer a clue what the website is about. Something along the lines of "To blaze, or not to blaze... what both sides are doing to win your vote!" Pictures along the right hand side are going to be the links to other pages and a small home, contact, etc. bar will be located at the bottom. Links to the anti-pot sites will reflect their views or maybe sample thumbnails from their sites. The pro-pot websites will get a similar treatment. 

At the moment I'm not sure if I want to dedicate a page to each text or organize them by similarities, differences, success vs failures, etc. I figure that will become apparent through the research. 

DTC 356- WSU regulations


Fair Use. Such a simple idea that is incredibly hard to define. We have our four rules:
1 The purpose of the use (commercial versus educational),
2 The nature of the work (imaginative or entertaining versus factual or reportorial),
3 The amount and substantiality of the portion used (most of the work or the heart of the work versus a small portion of it), and
4 The effect on the market (is the creator losing a potential audience versus is the creator gaining a potential audience).

but even with these guides, many works are increasingly hard to define. At the university level this becomes more muddled because most work begins as educational but many then go on to serve more purposes. The University has rights to certain levels of regulations. If they want to block websites that allow downloading that's fine because they provide free internet. Anyone using this should have to respect their rules because other options are available. If you can't handle the restrictions, McDonalds also gives free wifi without any regulations. Also, it could be said that WSU is simply trying to protect themselves from ending up like the young man Lessig mentioned. These standards are fine. The most interesting relationship is between professors and their students.

 Alex Jarvis described himself as a 'Voluntarist' meaning that human actions should be voluntary. I think that this philosophy should be applied to work created by students and professors. By Lessig's, (and the law's), definition anything I create in a fixed form is mine. If I create a blog and use it to respond to questions from class, I have copyrights to those words. Now if a professor wants to use some of this writing as an example, should he have to ask my permission? I think this would depend on the use. Most of the time I think students should grant someone like a professor fair use. If they are using it to further the education system that a student is already a part of, then it should be free. Quotes from work, screen shots of a blog, etc. Attribution should be required but no monetary compensation. People should allow educational works to enhance further educational works. However, when the Professor makes money from a textbook he wrote using some work from his students, what happens then? Again, if he quotes a student and references their work, then it should be ok. If he takes an idea from the student's intellectual property and then writes and entire chapter based on that idea, then maybe the student should receive compensation.
           
We will always have copyright laws. They are unavoidable and so in that regards we need more regulation but the right kind of regulation. There are so many types of intellectual property and the uses differ even greater and the law needs to account for these subtleties. We should stay away from large general policies and focus on defining what situations are considered stealing. As a culture we should decide to what extent sharing/borrowing/stealing ideas should be allowed.

Side note:
A general "Don't be a dick" policy would be fantastic. People are getting too worked up about laws and retribution and they are failing to simply work together as a society. Hopefully a younger generation, built on piracy, will have better attitudes towards copyrights as they age and enter the professional market. I don't think anyone who has ever pirated a song or movie could be a jerk towards someone borrowing from them.

DTC 356 Copyright Criminals


Technology advances and so do we. So do our laws. However, we are at a stage where our copyright laws have not yet caught up with the evolution of our culture. We have a culture that is ready to create, ready to invent new things but often this means borrowing or sampling from other works. The problem isn't our culture's ability to create, it's the ability to create and actually not get sued once something is completed. Lessig mentions "Technology means you can now do amazing things easily; but you couldn’t easily do them legally" (105).

            In the past few chapters Lessig has illustrated several problems with copyrights' duration and scope. The duration has increased repeatedly until now where many copyrights will outlive the generation that made the work famous. I think the problem isn't the duration of copyright as much as it is the scope. Lessigs states his main purpose for this book "My claim is that the Internet should at least force us to rethink the conditions under which the law of copyright automatically applies,17 because it is clear that the current reach of copyright was never contemplated, much less chosen, by the legislators who enacted copyright law" (140). I believe this point is shared by the video Copyright Criminals. It is what people and companies are doing with their copyrights.

            The biggest argument for sampling is that it is part of our culture. Lessig gives endless references to big name companies that demonstrated this creative thievery (most notably Disney), although these same companies will allow no one to use the same practices. Lessig notes "Every e-mail, every note to your spouse, every doodle, every creative act that’s reduced to a tangible form—all of this is automatically copyrighted." It struck me that technology is actually restricting the creativity of people as much as it is enabling them to create. The problem is that work that is essentially irrelevant in today's culture can be reused easily using technology. However, the original artist can then sue someone even though their work would ahve never resurfaced. Lessig comments that the average life span of creative work is just a couple of years. The law should be able to reflect relevant works differently than those would never make a comeback on their own. 

            Stealing and sampling without attribution is more or less wrong and most people can agree that the original artist should receive some sort of compensation. However, this doesn't mean a company should have the right to sue a teenager for hundreds of millions of dollars. Why not a one time fee, decided by the courts in order to use a sample. 1% of sales or whatever then the more samples you use, the less you make but everything is legal. And then it won't cost too much when you don't have any money. As you make more, you are able to pay your 'inspirations' more. Also, a person should only have to pay once his work results in X amount of dollars made. I'm sure people have thought of a similar solution (and probably much better ones), but why hasn't anything been done yet? As a society we need to recognize these issues and solve them as a culture with laws that reflect our culture's practices. The most striking line from the movie is that it was cheaper to cover an entire song than sample three seconds of it. Seriously? How is America ok with policies such as this?

Monday, September 24, 2012

DTC 355 post4- Project Proposal



For project 2, I will analyze online texts of organizations and individuals that have opposing views on the legalization of marijuana. It will be interesting to see how each side will construct arguments that are meant to have contrasting effects on their audience. Although, the goal of both is to acquire your vote.

Most of the texts that support marijuana reform hold onto a green theme, obviously trying to link their words to the product they are pushing for. They feature navigation bars with similar links such as: facts, organize, legal, state info, etc. The organization run sites lean towards professional rhetoric, speaking directly about legal issues, and failures of the government. Blogs take more liberty and attempt to entertain by demonizing the DEA while promoting the benefits of marijuana.

Texts that are against the legalization of marijuana are harder to find given that their target audience has already heard most of the reasons to keep weed illegal.  The reform sites, I believe, are targeted at a younger, more digitally literate group and the sites are endless. Sites against marijuana have a common theme as well: Marijuana destroys families. It is impossible to find green, unless there is a red X over it, and the rhetoric is exclusively targeted at parents and grandparents. They indicate how the reform is targeting teens but they fail target anyone in the younger demographics.

It will be interesting to see which arguments come across most successfully when accounting for the target audience. What will work on teenagers is likely to be the opposite of what convinces parents to vote for.

Organizations Against Marijuana
http://www.marijuanaharmsfamilies.com/ -a project of SaveCalifornia.com
http://www.calmca.org/ -Citizens Against Legalizing Marijuana
Organizations for Marijuana Reform
-Just Say Now
http://norml.org/ -Working to reform marijuana laws
http://www.drugpolicy.org/node/3480 -we are the Drug Policy Alliance
http://www.regulatemarijuana.org/about -Campaign to regulate marijuana like alcohol
Relevant blogs
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/stopmarijuana/ -petition to stop legalization
http://sensiblewashington.org/blog/ - help legalize in washington


Friday, September 14, 2012

DTC 356 is it piracy?






For my FA 332 class last spring, we were instructed to recreate an old painting. Something done by a master of his/her field, that exemplifies the themes that consist of a specific genre of art. I chose "The Guitar" by Juan Gris, a cubist painter from the same era as Picasso. I created an image in Photoshop that was supposed to be a modern, digital interpretation of his work. It features elements of guitars, an attempt at cubist perspectives, and certain colors that were obviously sampled from the original work.  Assuming that Juan's painting was made in recent times, I certainly sampled some content from his painting; did I pirate the idea from his work? Do I owe the original composer money?

            As Lessig mentions in Free Culture, the word "piracy" isn't well defined and encompasses much more than it should. It is hard to draw the line between inspiration and copying techniques. If Samsung's devices operate the same code as Apple to create the touch screen actions, then maybe they are copying and benefitting from it. If they saw an Apple phone, thought that it was a cool idea, and use the same commands to operate their phones one could argue that they were inspired.

            Companies need to take a step back and think about what is really hurting them. Lessig mentions "We may have been born a pirate nation, but we will not allow any other nation to have a similar childhood" (63). He indicates that our country has getting carried away with our piracy concerns. If a phone company takes the idea of pinching to make pictures smaller on the phone, is that the same as me taking the various techniques used by cubists and repurposing them? The devices interfaces looks different, most of the navigation is different, but an action by the user is the same. There are a few elements that resemble one another, although the end product is considerably different.

            Following the logic of the big corporations, does their new law suit mean that Apple is paying someone for the right to make a qwerty keyboard? Surely someone designed it and everyone else likes to use it. Apple's keyboard may not be the same font, size, or contain every button that was on the original keyboard but their users navigate it all the same. Who was the first to make a laptop where the screen folds up? I don't think they sued everyone from then on the claims that "we patented folding technology".

            Brands have been imitating others for centuries. Most artists have drawn inspiration from a wide variety of works before them. Apple may claim that Samsung stole their ideas but they didn't steal their property in a physical sense. As Lessig explains "The difference is, of course, that when you take a book from Barnes &Noble, it has one less book to sell. By contrast, when you take an MP3 from a computer network, there is not one less CD that can be sold" (64). Apple can still sell their product. They can continue to use the pinch and other touch screen actions to help their users navigate the phone. I doubt that anyone purchased a Samsung phone just so they could pinch a picture and make it smaller.

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

DTC 356 and Futurama (super-relevant to todays class discussion)

I was watching Futurama today and the professor agrees with our class.
Its on netflix Volume 5: Ep 8 That Darn Katz!    18:30 in

DTC 356 Blog 2 Information at our fingertips


Vannevar Bush was a true visionary and in his essay "As We May Think" he describes many technological process that have come to pass and are still in use today. He was able to think about how information needs to be used and collected. The department store analogy on pg 9 was the best one for me. I take for granted everything that happens at the push of a button. Now people can just swipe a card with a smart-phone. I never really thought about how many things are included on my card. Name, dob, expiration date, account number, security number, bank name and it can also reveal my balance, transmit info directly to my account, and give the clerk all the above info in an instant. wow.

He also describes the "Memex," and advanced workstation where people will be able to bring up past documents with a button and bring them up on a screen. The process he describes is no different than scanning and image into a computer and storing it on a hard drive. He then talks about the way colleagues can share this information with one another by calling it up with a button.

He can think of all the way information is used and stored but he still doesn't come up with a reliable way to call upon that information. He states that "the human mind operates by association, everything doesn't necessarily have one correct place or path" (9). While the memex provides a way to call something by name, it doesn't solve the issue of association.

I think that today we are coming closer to being able to search by emotion or idea rather than key terms. Modern examples include Pandora radio, it doesn't just play music from a genre, it works off the song before it and responds to your 'likes' and 'dislikes'. There are countless playlists on youtube that have been compiled to form list such as "relaxing study mix." The playlist may have rock, trance, instrumental, etc, because they appeal to a certain emotion or action. This may not help find a scholarly article but it's a start.

In order to perfect the act of searching for information, we need to rely on humans all over the world reading and responding to information. Like the playlists and blogs, the internet has enabled everyone to become a critic. We can log in and potentially write a review for every product we own, every book we've read, and every movie we've ever watched. I use the website RottenTomatoes every time before I go to the theatre. They give separate ratings based on the critics and users opinions. I am able to read comments and see exactly what people thought about while watching it. Furthermore, people make references to other movies and lead me down that path as well. One could argue that I have found a majority of my favorite movies through association like this. With people writing about how they feel and descriptions beyond mere summary, we are closer to being able to search simply based on emotions and associations.

In the age of technology, our information can only be harnessed by cooperating with other humans. Our social networks are growing and the number of people online is astonishing. Collaborating through these networks will be essential in utilizing the information we have at our fingertips.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l592XptAI-w

Monday, September 3, 2012

DTC_355_VisualComposition


Emphasis

1. Due to the nature of the stop motion, the first thing I see is what the author is writing. The other things in the image, laptop, phone, scissors, etc, are static and don't distract too much from  the writing. The method of crossing out the previous definition definitely makes you understand the purpose of the video however, it's very hard to see. If the author intended this, and wants the audience to watch the rest of the video to figure it out, then I believe the technique was effective. Otherwise, I would have made all of the text a little bit bigger, especially do to the scribbley handwriting. 

2. The stillness ensures that nothing distracts from the current image. The audience isn't following her hand or looking at her head. The stillness makes the image feel complete. The audience is no longer waiting for a final product but now can evaluate exactly what they see. 

3. The sound gives the video a sense of urgency. Action is taking place. The music may emphasize these emotions but I didn't think  it emphasized and specific part of the video. There was a slight transitional sound when the pages turned but if the music had also changed then the emphasis would be greater. It does make what she is writing seem much more important than if the music was simply a piano. It almost makes it feel like what she is writing could be dangerous or revolutionary. 

Contrast

1. The most obvious contrast is the style of the cartoon and the voice of the narrator. As mentioned in the lesson, the digital voice is not what you would expect from the cartoon. I would have expected a male voice, friendly, with informative tone. However, the voice distinguishes the message from the visuals of the video. The purpose is clearly something for the digital age and the font on the box also emphasizes this. Also, the color of the text stands out from the gray box but still reflects the color of the animation. This actually helps to connect the visuals to the words. 

2. The first clip shows that the words and theJUMP are connected to video. They expect multimedia projects that include both words and animation/images. This message against the black background, isolates these words from the visuals. The only thing with emphasis are the words on the screen and in fact the message is about an essay. They make it clear that this portion of the submission is supposed to be about text. 

3. If I were to design a poster it would be clear that the focus is a multi media project. Some elements would be brought together to illustrate the multimodal nature of the project. For example theJUMP logo and whatever visual aid indicates success would be closely oriented with other forms of visual communication. Pictures and words with a similar color. I would contrast these images from the requirements using spatial organization and probably color. It would show that the multimedia aspect is one part of the project and the essays are another. 

Organization

The images are organized to make people take a look at what they are dependent on.
1. The first photo depicts a foot with a bar-code on it. I believe most people will take this image one of two ways. It either comments on how the human body can be treated like a commodity or it shows how close we are to becoming a part of the technology we use. 

The next image shows 1 + 1 =2 in black and white. This could simply indicate an equation on the board or the numbers can relate to the numbers on the bar-code. When placed right next to each other, the focus is clearly on numbers. 

This theme is solidified by the next picture of the parking meter. This picture serves several purposes. It again reinforces the idea that people are reliant on numbers. Also, that people are always in a hurry in this life governed by numbers. The black and white creates a dreary tone and also continues the color from the slide before. The plain nature of these three slides set up a huge contrast between the bright colors in the fourth image. 

This picture is supposed to remind the audience  of the saying "stop and smell the roses." This assumes that the audiences understands American culture references. Without knowing however, the contrast still gives the story a more positive feeling. 

The story is concluded with an artist, seemingly inspired by flowers such as the were in the image before. The only words that stand out are "We Can Dream" which challenges the audience to do the same. Hopefully the story can remind the audience to take a break from technology every once in a while. 

2. Another argument I considered was a direct contrast between each of the images, alternating between black/white and color. However, it was harder to maintain a theme when the images were broken up. 

Another way that may provide a similar argument would be to show them in reverse order. Trying to show that we used to be inspired by art and nature, then we went to numbers, numbers brought technology, technology results in us with barcodes on our feet. 

3. Music could potentially help in conveying the tone that is determined solely by the colors. If the music starts out monotonous or menacing it convey a negative tone towards the numbers. Then music could be upbeat and help aid the positive nature of the bright slides at the end. I think having the only words on any of the images be "we can dream" produces a great effect because they are alone. Adding more words might take away from their emphasis. 

Alignment
 
1. The words were horizontally aligned but jumbled at first. Just when my eye could figure it out, the words transformed into lowercase and straightened out. The straightening is almost like an eye focusing and it brings me to the words 'Insects' without me even trying. The way the words flow into each other does create a strong relationship between the two.

2. The reflection and the background color lead me to believe that there is water at the bottom. Also, the contrails cut off the top of the screen almost forcing the audience to look down towards the moon and therefore the letters. I think other arrangements might let the eye wander and the words wouldn't have such a strong effect.

3. The words are on a different alignment to distinguish the two lines of poetry. Adding different audio further creates contrast between the two scenes. However, the vertical alignment is the same which keeps the theme the same even though the words themselves are different.

4. The placement of the words illustrates a tear welling up in the eye of the background image. This matches the tone of the man's voice from the audio. The visual connecting with the words makes them stronger and adds the gestural mode to this particular scene.

5. I think the placement is supposed to represent what the words literally stand for, rather than the meaning they reveal when played. The air is higher, next comes earth and the lowest is water. In addition the words seem to respond to the background elements, mimicking the line that cuts across the screen and settling under the moon. This alignment encourages the user to start at the top with air and follow the path down to earth and then water.

Proximity

1. I began with the title in the upper left corner in a decorative font. Then the description of the novel was placed below. They are clearly separated by different fonts and size but they are both left aligned. They are both important information indicating the content of the book. I chose the picture of the seagull flying because the novel is about flight. The author's name is isolated by proximity but is connected to the title through the font, encouraging the audience to view them together.

2. I think the most important piece of information is the title. Its importance is conveyed by its size and relationship to the other elements on the page. It is at the top and left aligned which is where a western audience normally begins a page in a book. The layout indicates that things should be clearly defined and the information can be read in an instant without any difficulty. It also shows a clear hierarchy where the most important information is at the top.

3. The difficulty is trying to convey the content of the book, or at least create interest in that content, only using  text and a static image. On a digital copy, the text that reads "a novel about flight" could fly on and off the page conveying a stronger message while the title could remain on its own. If equal importance should be given to the author, maybe the title could rotate with the author's name somehow.